Discuss Ancestry, Health and Genetics – deCODEme Forum
We at deCODEme just wanted to let you know that we have added a Forum where you can discuss genetics, ancestry and health. Our experts are looking forward to your questions and comments so we hope you take advantage of this new feature.
We are constantly working on making deCODEme more valuable and informative and we appreciate your continued interest.
We hope you have a pleasant and festive holiday.
The deCODEme Team
download mcafee total protection PowerDVD 8 Ultra download ahead nero v7 0 ultra ahead nero update Nero 9 download ahead software nero ahead nero 7.7.5.1 Total Protection 2009 download ahead nero burning rights
The results of the “ancestral origins” indicates an African contribution that’s pretty high (9%). I have had a number of genetic analysis done by more than one company and NO ONE has shown any significant contribution from Africa (and by African I’m assuming you mean sub-Saharan African and not Northern African). Every test I’ve done (including 23andme) indicates <1% (noise). We know our relatives very well and there is no sub-Saharan African in our family tree going back at least 150 years that is known. It's all European and American Indian. Either your sample populations include blacks with European blood (thus resulting in the questionable similarity) or the scientific analysis you're using is erroneous.
littlemama
29 Dec 09 at 9:17 am